Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0361319870190010191
Korean Journal of Medical Technologists
1987 Volume.19 No. 1 p.191 ~ p.197
A Comparison of the Lugol¢¥s Iodine Method and Trichrome Staining Method for the Detection of Intestinal Protozoa




Abstract
The detection rate of intestinal protozoa was compared using the Lugol¢¥s iodine method and trichrome staining method. Lugol¢¥s iodine method used following formalin-ether concentration (MGL), a most widely used protozoa examination. The trichrome staining method was performed after preserving the specimen in fixative solution. During the period from April 1986 to February 1987, a total of 390 samples from patients of Wonju Christian Hospital were collected and examined.
The results are summarized as follows
1 . The detection rate of intestinal protozoa was 4.4% by Lugol¢¥s iodine method compared with 14.2% by trichrome staining method.
2 . Four species of protozoan cysts were observed by Lugol¢¥s iodine method, the detection rate of each intestinal protozoa was 1.8% for Endolimax nana, 1.0% for Entamoeba coli, 0.8% for Entamoeba histolvtica, and 0.5% for Giardia lamblia.
3 . Using the trichrome staining method, four species of protozoan trophozoites¢¥ and cysts were detected, and the detection rate of each intestinal protozoa was 6.5% for Endolimax nana, 3.6% for Entamoeba soli, 3.1% for Entamoeba histolytica, and 1.4% for Giardia lamblia.
4 . The sensitivity was 28%, Lugol¢¥s method, 92% by trichrome staining and false negative 72% and 8% respectively. Negative predictive value was 88% by Lugol¢¥s method and 99% by trichrome staining.
So we concluded that the trichrome staining method was the most reliable method of examination of intestinal protozoa.
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information